Here’s a smug little soundbite that’s become the gospel of modern feminism: “We don’t need men.” It’s delivered with all the self-righteous swagger of a toddler declaring they’ve outgrown nappies—adorable, until you test it against reality and watch it collapse in a heap. This isn’t just a throwaway line; it’s the latest mantra from a radical feminist echo chamber that’s taken root in the mainstream media, where men are painted as disposable relics and women as some invincible, self-sufficient species. The delusion is as laughable as it is dangerous.
Let’s get one thing straight: this claim doesn’t just defy logic—it spits in the face of the undeniable truth that men have built and continue to maintain the world we all inhabit. From the roads we drive on to the roofs over our heads, men have forged a safe, comfortable existence that women thrive in—a fact feminists refuse to acknowledge, let alone appreciate. Instead, they peddle this fantasy of independence, blissfully unaware that it’s propped up by the very systems they scorn. Enough is enough. This article is a no-nonsense dissection of that ideology, written for those who’ve grown weary of progressive fairy tales and want the unvarnished truth. Buckle up—it’s time to dismantle the myth.
What Happens If Men Disappear?
Picture this: all men vanish from the Earth tomorrow. No grand farewell, no warning—just gone. What’s left? Chaos, and fast. By day one, the smug feminist chorus of “we don’t need men” would be drowned out by the sound of civilisation crumbling. Power grids would flicker and die—90% of electrical engineers are male, and they’re not around to fix the inevitable faults. Water systems? Down the drain, with 87% of utility workers missing. Fancy a trip to the shops? Good luck—95% of HGV drivers are men, and the lorries aren’t moving. This isn’t speculation; it’s arithmetic.
The rot spreads quick. Roads crack and bridges buckle without the 98% male construction and maintenance crews to patch them up. Crime surges as the thin blue line—70% male—disappears, leaving no one to stop the looters. Firefighters, 96% male, aren’t there to douse the flames when sparks fly from those failing grids. And the military? With 85% of its personnel gone, borders dissolve, and any notion of national security evaporates. Women might fancy themselves warriors in theory, but when the rubber hits the road—or rather, when it doesn’t—who’s keeping the wolves at bay?
Then there’s the economy. Mining—95% male—grinds to a halt, so kiss goodbye to coal, metals, and fuel. Manufacturing, 75% male, stalls—no cars, no machines, no goods. Agriculture? With 70% of farmers vanished, food stocks dwindle, and supermarket shelves sit bare. The comfortable bubble feminists luxuriate in bursts, exposing a brutal truth: the world they claim to dominate relies on men to function. No amount of empowerment seminars can shore up a dam or fell a tree. This isn’t about feelings—it’s about who keeps the lights on, and the answer isn’t found in a gender studies lecture hall.
Men Built the World Women Thrive In
Let’s rewind the clock a bit. The modern world—flush toilets, electric lights, motorways, hospitals—didn’t spring from the ether. Men built it. With sweat, ingenuity, and often their lives, they laid the bricks and strung the wires that turned muddy villages into gleaming cities. Railways crisscrossing the countryside? Men. Skyscrapers piercing the skyline? Men. The NHS stitching up the sick? Men pioneered the surgery and engineered the machines. This isn’t chest-thumping—it’s history, plain and simple.
Fast forward to today, and men still keep the show running. When storms rip down power lines, it’s blokes in high-vis jackets—99% male—who climb the poles in the dark. Plumbed a loo lately? Doubt it—94% of plumbers are men. Soldiers guard the borders (85% male), binmen haul the rubbish (96% male), and fishermen brave the seas (98% male) so the rest of us don’t starve. These aren’t glamorous gigs, and you won’t catch feminists queuing up for them, but they’re the backbone of the safe, cushy life women enjoy—a life so secure it’s taken for granted.
That safety is no accident. Low crime rates, clean water, warm homes—these are luxuries women in the West assume as their birthright, not realising they’re the dividends of male labour and sacrifice. Yet, what’s the thanks? A sneering “we don’t need men” from feminists who’d rather rewrite history than admit it. The leftist media plays along, airbrushing out the lads who tamed the wild and built the walls, all to prop up a myth that women did it solo. It’s erasure dressed up as empowerment, and it’s bollocks. Men didn’t just build this world—they keep it spinning, whether the sisterhood likes it or not.
The Delusion of “Independence”
So, feminists reckon they don’t need men. It’s a cute fantasy—like a child insisting they could live on biscuits alone—until you peek behind the curtain. This so-called independence isn’t some triumphant female superpower; it’s a privilege, bought and paid for by the very systems men uphold. The world feminists strut through—laptops humming, streets lit, Deliveroo at the door—exists because blokes keep the gears turning. Take that away, and their “self-sufficiency” evaporates quicker than a puddle in July.
The hypocrisy’s glaring. They’ll rail against “patriarchy” from flats heated by male-mined coal, sipping coffee shipped by male sailors, tweeting on phones assembled by male hands. Rights? Defended by male soldiers. Welfare? Funded by taxes from male-dominated industries. Yet, they’re blind to it—or choose to be. The mainstream media, ever eager to pander, spins this as proof of female omnipotence, ignoring the inconvenient truth: women’s “independence” leans on men like a crutch they pretend isn’t there.
Look at the numbers. STEM fields—driving innovation—73% male. Trades like plumbing and carpentry—95% male. Dangerous jobs—mining, logging, fishing—over 90% male. Women aren’t clamouring to fill those boots, and why would they? They don’t have to. Men do the heavy lifting, literally and figuratively, so feminists can sit back and pontificate about not needing them. It’s not independence; it’s selective ignorance, a luxury afforded by the safe, male-built bubble they’d rather die than credit. The delusion isn’t just thick—it’s parasitic.
Men’s Gratitude vs. Feminist Ingratitude
Ask a man, “Do you need women?” and you’ll get a straight answer: “Yes.” No hemming, no hawing—just an honest nod to the reality that women bring something vital to the table. Family, emotional depth, the quiet strength of nurturing—men don’t shy away from admitting they’d be lost without it. It’s not weakness; it’s clarity, a grounded recognition of how the sexes fit together. Men aren’t too proud to say they need women, because they’re not ungrateful—or delusional.
Now flip the script. Ask a feminist if she needs men, and you’ll get a lecture on “systemic oppression” or a haughty “nope” as if she’s single-handedly keeping the world afloat. It’s not just denial—it’s ingratitude, a petulant refusal to clock the debt owed to the blokes who’ve built the stage she’s grandstanding on. Men laid the foundations—literally—and keep the lights on, yet feminists act like it’s all a happy accident, not a product of male sweat and sacrifice. Where men see partnership, these women see a chance to flex their ego.
This isn’t just a feminist tic; it’s a symptom of the progressive rot seeping through society—rejecting reality for a feel-good myth. Men don’t play that game. They’re not out here pretending women are dispensable, because they know better. Meanwhile, feminists cling to their “independence” like a toddler with a security blanket, oblivious to the irony that it’s male effort keeping the cold at bay. Men say “yes” with humility; feminists say “no” with arrogance. One’s rooted in truth—the other’s a tantrum in denial.
Conclusion
Let’s sum it up. If men vanished, the world would unravel—power out, roads ruined, shelves empty, and safety a distant memory. That’s not a theory; it’s what happens when the lads who keep civilisation ticking clock off for good. Men built this place—stone by stone, wire by wire—and they maintain it, giving women a secure, comfortable life that feminists sneer at rather than salute. The “we don’t need men” brigade aren’t just deluded—they’re spoiled, basking in a system they’d never survive without, all while pretending they’re above it.
This isn’t about grovelling for thanks; it’s about calling out nonsense. Feminists can preen all they like, but their independence is a mirage, propped up by the very blokes they dismiss. Men, meanwhile, don’t faff about—they admit they need women, because facts trump pride. The contrast is stark: one side’s honest, the other’s living a lie. So, to the sceptics nodding along, fed up with progressive drivel—keep hammering this truth. The “don’t need men” crowd aren’t just wrong; they’re a cautionary tale of what happens when you let ideology blind you to the obvious. Reality doesn’t bend for tantrums, and neither should we.
